Ancient Man and His First Civilizations
Etruria-2
Modern Italy
The Eurasian Invasion - the Latin's
When last we left Etruria,
we were mystified by the Etruscan's policy of not helping each other when faced
with a common threat. This incredible policy would of course, have devastating
effects. Moving ahead to perhaps 1100 B.C. It is at about this time, that
Albino people from the Eurasian plains now called "the Latin's" later
known as the Romans - migrate in. These Latins may have accompanied the
Hellenes into Greece, and then continued on into Italy. The nature of the early
contact between the two peoples, is unknown. But, the later relationship is
well known to be one of violence. (Please remember that we are using the terms
Latin's and Hellenes in reference to Eurasian Albinos as a convenience ONLY).
Soon after the invasion of Whites from Eurasia began, a coalition
of the original Black inhabitants of Italy, Greece and the Aegean area, formed
a conglomeration called the "Sea People". They boarded ships with all
of their belongings and fled the area. But those that stayed behind, still had
to deal with the White newcomers.
Etruscan settlements were frequently built on a hill—the steeper
the better—and surrounded by thick walls. So according to Roman mythology, Rome
may have actually have been built by Etruscans, they did so on the Palatine
Hill according to the Etruscan model: that is, they began with a pomoerium or
sacred ditch. Then, they proceeded to the walls.
Were the original Romans Black People?
|
Were
the original Romans Black People? As we have shown on many pages, all of
those marble statues and busts of "Supposed" White Greeks and
Romans, that we find in museums today, are really 1600-1800s fabrications.
White history is so replete with lies and fake artifacts, that it would be
impossible for this, or any other "Truth Seeking" publication, to
investigate every possibility. So for convenience, we will not delve into
this founding of Rome, as documented in the Aeneid. But rather, will work
with the conventional story.
|
|
The
Aeneid
The Aeneid is a Latin epic poem written by Virgil in the late
1st century BC (70–19 B.C.) that tells the legendary story of Aeneas,
a Trojan who traveled to Italy, where he became the ancestor
of the Romans. It is composed of roughly 10,000 lines in dactylic
hexameter.
The first six of the poem's twelve books tell the story of
Aeneas's wanderings from Troy to Italy, and the poem's second half tells of
the Trojans' ultimately victorious war upon the Latins (Whites),
under whose name Aeneas and his Trojan followers are destined to be subsumed.
The hero Aeneas was already known to Greco-Roman legend and
myth, having been a character in the Iliad; Virgil took the disconnected
tales of Aeneas' wanderings, his vague association with the foundation of
Rome and a personage of no fixed characteristics other than a scrupulous
piety, and fashioned this into a compelling founding myth or nationalist epic
that at once tied Rome to the legends of Troy, glorified traditional Roman
virtues and legitimized the Julio-Claudian dynasty as descendants of
the founders, heroes and gods of Rome and Troy.
|
Entellus was a Trojan hero from
whom the town of Entella in Sicily was believed to have received its name.
He was a friend of the Trojan king Acestes. A boxing match between Entellus
and Dares is described in Virgil's Aeneid.
|
|
|
|
The fight between
Entellus and Dares, Roman mosaic, ca. 175 A.D.
|
|
|
The
reason the poem is important, is because the Trojans were Phrygian's - and
this is what the Phrygian king Midas looked like.
And
this is how Etruscans depicted the Trojans (the guy on the ground).
|
|
Quote: Although it was
commissioned by the Emperor Augustus, the poem is more than early imperial
propaganda. It proclaims the divine mission of Aeneas to found Rome and the
divine injunction of the Romans to unite the world under a noble Emperor such
as Augustus.
As a logical matter
then, why would the Romans tolerate, much less enthusiastically accept (the
Aeneid was very popular), a founding story that gives credit to Blacks for
the nations creation, if they (the elites), themselves were not Black?
The other inescapable
conclusion, is that the Emperor Augustus was himself Black. In which
case, we can chalk this statue up, to the same people as "The Dying
Gaul" statue. With it being nothing more than "Pure White
fantasy" probably done in the 1600-1700s.
From Wiki
Augustus of Prima Porta (Italian: Augusto di Prima Porta) is a
2.04m high marble statue of Augustus Caesar which was discovered on April 20,
1863, in the Villa of Livia at Prima Porta, near Rome. Augustus Caesar's
wife, Livia Drusilla, retired to the villa after his death. The sculpture is
now displayed in the Braccio Nuovo of the Vatican Museums.
The dating of the Primaporta piece is widely contested. It is
thought to be a marble copy of a possible bronze original. This original,
along with other high honors, was devoted to Augustus by the Senate in 20
B.C, and set up in a public place. Up until this time Augustus had lived
modestly, but the fact that the statue was found in his widow's villa shows
that he was thoroughly pleased with it.
It is also contested that this particular sculpture is a
reworking in marble of a bronze original, possibly a gift from Tiberius
Caesar to his mother Livia (since it was found in her villa Ad Gallinas Albas
in the vicinity of the ninth marker of the via Flaminia, and close to a late
Imperial gate called Prima Porta) after Augustus' death and in honor of the
woman who had campaigned so long for him to become the next Caesar. This
would explain the divine references to Augustus in the piece, notably his being
barefoot, the standard representation of gods or heroes in classical
iconography. Also, the reliefs in the cuirass depict the retrieval of
Crassus' standards captured by the Parthians, an event in which the young
Tiberius himself took a part, serving as intermediary with the Parthian king,
in the act that is shown in the central scene of the armor, possibly his
grandest service to his adopted father Augustus. With the introduction of
Tiberius as the figure responsible for the retrieval of the standards, he
associates himself with Augustus, the emperor and the new god, as Augustus
himself had done previously with Julius Caesar. Under this hypothesis, the
dating of the statue can be placed during the first years of Tiberius' reign
as emperor (14 — 37 A.D.).
|
 As a further
demonstration of the problems Whites have with the actual race of Augustus:
there is the matter of this statue head "Supposedly" Discovered at
Meroe in 1910 by J. Garstang. Based on accounts of the Roman wars with Meroe
in Strabo's Geography, circa 22 A.D. It was decided that it was the head from
one of the many giant statues of Augustus, which were scattered all over
Egypt. Aside from that absurdity, of which there is no evidence, the statue
head of course, has no inscription.
Like Herodotus, Strabo wrote entertainment in the guise of
history. His accounts of the wars is obviously fanciful, and to use that type
of material to make historical judgments, is a clear indication of the
fragility of White history.
Click Here for some authentic and very reveling images of
Roman Emperor Valerian: Click
>>>
|
|
In time, the Romans had learned how to built cities, now there is
great competition for power and territory. Wars rage, but the Etruscan cities
fight alone, and the Romans can simply attack and annex each individual city;
divide and conquer was the order of the day. This disunity is further
illustrated by the fact that the Romans concluded treaties with individual
Etruscan city/states, rather than the whole.
But the Etruscans reemerged as a local power during 800 - 700 B.C,
spreading their trade to Corsica, Sardinia and Iberia and creating a powerful
navy to guard their interests. The Phoenicians and Etruscans became trading
partners and rivals, exchanging goods and opportunistic raids with each other.
However the situation changed after the "Whites" of Greece, had
consolidated power and began to expand into the Western Mediterranean at about
750 B.C.}
In approximately 600 B.C, the Etruscans attacked and occupied the
area of Latium and settled themselves in the city of Rome, from here the
influence of Etruscan civilization and art made itself felt in the entire Latin
sphere.
But their expansion soon collided with that of the Greeks,
especially in the sixth century B.C, when Phoceans (Greeks in Italy) founded
colonies along the coast of France, Catalonia and Corsica. This led the
Etruscans to ally themselves with the Carthaginians (Phoenicians), whose
interests also collided with the Greeks.
{Note: The Phoenicians had planted trading posts in Africa,
Sicily, Sardinia and Iberia during 1100-900 B.C. while creating their trading
monopoly. They had a relatively free hand during that period as other
civilizations were suffering from a "Dark Age" during that period
because of the invasion of Whites from Eurasia.
In 540 B.C, at the Battle of Alalia; which took place off the
coast of Corsica, between Phocaeans and allied Etruscans and Carthaginians. The
Punic-Etruscan fleet of 120 ships defeated the Greek force of sixty ships and
the nearby colony of Alalia (now Aléria) was taken over by the Etruscans.
Corsica was shared by the Carthaginians and Etruscans, and Carthage retained
Sardinia.
This led to a new distribution of power in the western
Mediterranean Sea. Though the battle had no clear winner, Carthage managed to
expand its sphere of influence at the expense of both the Etruscans and the
Greeks, and Etruria saw itself relegated to the northern Tyrrhenian Sea. From
the first half of the fifth century, the new international political situation
meant the beginning of the Etruscan decline after losing their southern
provinces.
As Caucasians kept coming in, Rome soon became a large city,
similar to the powerful cities of southern Etruria, and it had also become
predominately Caucasian. Accordingly, it was a Caucasian uprising that drove
the Etruscans from Rome in 509 B.C.
In 480 B.C, Etruria's ally Carthage, was defeated by a coalition
of Magna Graecia (the Greek colonized zone encompassing Sicily and Southern
Italy) cities led by Syracuse. Later, it was a coalition of Caucasians -
Latin’s and the "new" Greeks, that led to the Etruscans' withdrawal
from the whole of Latium in 475 B.C.
A year later, in 474 B.C, Syracuse's tyrant Hiero, defeated the
Etruscans at the Battle of Cumae. Later, Etruria saw a Gallic (Celtic - see
next page for more on the Gauls/Celts) invasion end its influence over the Po
valley and the Adriatic coast. Meanwhile, Rome had started annexing Etruscan
cities. This first led to the loss of their north provinces.
The Etruscans continued to decline, until finally Etruria was
incorporated into Rome. Over time the Etruscans ceased to exist as a separate
people, and they along with their culture and technology were totally absorbed
into Rome. However, it should be pointed out, that if Etruscan Tomb Paintings
are any indication, absorption by the Latin's was not unduly traumatic.
|
Once again, we must as
the question: "Were the original Romans and Greeks Black People?"
Please consider: aside from the marble statues and busts (which we know to be
1600-1800s creations), which depict them as Whites. And the constant bombardment
of White media; such as Books, Movies, and Television, which serves to
"Condition" us to the concept - What evidence is there really that
these people were White?
Certainly there can be no
argument that Whites eventually took over. The question is "Which"
Whites, and When? When we cast aside all of those fake marble Statues and
Busts, and rely on only the authentic artwork which was done by the people
themselves, in their own ancient times, we see a very different story of
ancient Greece and Rome.
Below are pictures of
authentic ancient artwork, and links to more: When we look at them, something
very revealing is instantly apparent: the main subjects and owners of the
tombs, were all Black people - as were the "Gods". If all of the
wealthy "Elites" and Gods, were Black people, what does that tell
us about the nature of these ancient societies?
|
later history relates that some Etruscans lived in the Tuscus
vicus, the “Etruscan quarter”, and that there was an Etruscan line of kings
(albeit ones descended from a Greek, Demaratus the Corinthian) which succeeded
kings of Latin and Sabine origin.
Pompeii
The city of Pompeii is a partially buried Roman town-city near
modern Naples in the Italian region of Campania, in the territory of the comune
of Pompei. The name “Pompeii” in Latin is a second declension plural (Pompeii,
-orum). According to Theodor Kraus, “The root of the word Pompeii would appear
to be the Oscan word for the number five, pompe, which suggests that either the
community consisted of five hamlets or, perhaps, it was settled by a family
group (gens Pompeia).” Along with Herculaneum, its sister city, Pompeii was
destroyed and completely buried during a long catastrophic eruption of the
volcano Mount Vesuvius spanning two days in 79 AD.
Erotic art in Pompeii and Herculaneum was discovered in the
ancient cities around the bay of Naples (particularly of Pompeii and
Herculaneum) after extensive excavations began in the 18th century. The city
was found to be full of erotic art and frescoes, symbols, and inscriptions
regarded by its excavators as pornographic.
Click Here for more Pompeii frescoes (Caution: some are of a
pornographic nature). Click
Here >>>
|
|
Pompeii Wall mural
of Mercury/Priapus - between 89 B.C. and 79 A.D.
|
|
|
The Celts/Gaul's
By the end of the ancient era (B.C.), new invaders had migrated
into western Europe from the east; and pushed the remaining indigenous peoples
south. These new people were mainly Celts, who had been pushed out of their
central European lands by the invading White Germanic tribes.
By now, the original people had accepted rule of the conquering
Romans, though the acceptance was uneasy. As would be expected, there was
almost constant warfare between these two peoples, the western Celts known as
Gaul's, and the eastern Celts. But their hatred of each other was less than
their hatred of Roman rule. There were many rebellions against Rome by both
groups. As we can see from Julius Caesar's comments below; Gaul's and Celts
were the same people. As with all the ancient people of Europe, modern racists
have sought to portray them as White people. The famous marble statue "The
Dying Gaul" is a fake, just as is the statue of Vercingetorix that was put
up by Napoleon III in 1865. See photo below.
|
As we have said and demonstrated many times: modern Whites have
institutionalized the falsification of history. Even their translations of
ancient texts and historians, cannot be trusted. However, sometimes a bit
from one place, coupled with a bit from another place, yields the truth.
In "THE HISTORY OF COUNT ZOSIMUS" circa 500 A.D.
Sextus Julius Saturninus (the governor of Syria) is described as a Moor. In
other texts, he is described as a Gaul. Such interchangeability of
description, would not be possible if Gaul's and Moors were not the same
thing: Black People!
|
|
Strangely; the statue "The Dying Gaul" does seem to be
in exact conformity with the "Supposed" description of
"Diodorus Siculus" who is said to describe them as such:
“The Gauls are tall in body, with rippling muscles... They are
always washing their hair in limewater and pull it back from the forehead...
, so that that they look like Satyrs and Pans; the treatment of their hair
makes it so heavy and coarse that it looks like the mane of a horse... some
of them shave the beard, but others let it grow a little. The nobles shave
their cheeks but let the mustache grow until it covers the mouth".
|
Julius Caesar, in his book, Commentarii de Bello Gallico - ca. 50
B.C, comments:
All Gaul is divided into three parts, one of which the Belgae
inhabit, the Aquitani another, those who in their own language are called
Celts, in ours Gauls, the third. All these differ from each other in language,
customs and laws. The Garonne River (roughly divides France and Spain)
separates the Gauls from the Aquitani; the River Marne (runs east and southeast
from Paris) and the River Seine separate them from the Belgae. Of all these,
the Belgae are the bravest, because they are furthest from the civilisation and
refinement of (our) Province, and merchants least frequently resort to them,
and import those things which tend to effeminate the mind; and they are the
nearest to the Germani, who dwell beyond the Rhine (runs north from eastern
Switzerland through Germany and the Netherlands to its two-pronged outlet on
the North Sea), with whom they are continually waging war.
For which reason the Helvetii also surpass the rest of the Gaul's
in valour, as they contend with the Germani in almost daily battles, when they
either repel them from their own territories, or themselves wage war on their frontiers.
One part of these, which it has been said that the Gauls occupy, takes its
beginning at the River Rhone; it is bounded by the Garonne River, the Atlantic
Ocean, and the territories of the Belgae; it borders, too, on the side of the
Sequani and the Helvetii, upon the River Rhine, and stretches toward the north.
The Belgae rises from the extreme frontier of Gaul, extend to the lower part of
the River Rhine; and look toward the north and the rising sun. Aquitania
extends from the Garonne to the Pyrenees and to that part of the Atlantic (Bay
of Biscay) which is near Spain: it looks between the setting of the sun, and
the north star.
Note: The Helvetii, refers to a conglomeration of Celtic tribes
formed by the Helvetian's of southern Germany and numbering in excess of
300,000, who decided to flee the invading White Germanic tribes.
Vercingetorix
One of the last, or perhaps
the last, of the original Black civilizations to be destroyed by the Whites,
were the Arverni of southern France. They were an advanced culture who lived in
cities and were wealthy in gold and silver, (as attested to by the huge booty
taken from them by the Romans).
Their demise came about because of a revolt against Rome by
another Black Gaul city called "Carnutes". In early 52 B.C,
Carnutes used the turmoil that accompanied the death of Publius Clodius
Pulcher; a Roman politician, as an opportunity to rebell; they slaughtered all
of the Romans in their territory.
Seeing this, "Vercingetorix" a young nobleman of the
Arvernian capital city of Gergovia, moved to join the rebellion. He was however
rebuffed by the nobles of Gergovia, forcing him to raise an army in the
countryside. He then returned to Gergovia and took the city, whereupon he was
declared king.
In most historical accounts, it is said that Vercingetorix unified
ALL of the Gaul's under his command. In his campaign against Julius Caesar,
Vercingetorix was at first successful, but over time, the tide began to turn.
The end came at the Battle of Alesia, the capital city of another of the
Black Gaul people, the Mandubii.
At Alesia, Vercingetorix made his last stand. Caesar instead of
making a direct assault, surrounded the city with fortifications in order to
starve them out. When Vercingetorix sent for reinforcements, Caesar built
another set of fortifications to his rear, to hold back the
reinforcements. When the reinforcements arrived, they were of insufficient
number to break through Caesars line. After many loosing battles to break out,
Vercingetorix was forced to mount his horse, ride out and surrender to Caesar.
Vercingetorix was taken prisoner and imprisoned in the Tullianum
in Rome for five years, before being publicly displayed in Caesar's triumph in
46 B.C, after which he was executed. Gergovia, Alesia, and all the other Black
Gaullic cities were destroyed. It is estimated that one million persons died in
the wars, and another million were sold into slavery; at the end, Caesar had
effected an unprecedented genocide. The destruction was so complete, that at
this time, the only known evidence of their existence is Roman coins, (such as
the one above), and written Roman accounts.
Ancient references to the Celts/Gauls
The first literary reference to the Celtic people, as (Κeltoi) is
by the Greek historian Hecataeus of Miletus in 517 B.C; he locates the
''Keltoi'' tribe in Rhenania (West/Southwest Germany). The next Greek reference
to the ''Keltoi'' is by Herodotus in the mid 5th century B.C. He says that
"the river Ister (Danube) begins from the ''Keltoi'' and the city of
Pyrene and so runs that it divides Europe in the midst (now the ''Keltoi'' are
outside the Pillars of Heracles (Rock of Gibraltar) and border upon the Kynesians,
who dwell furthest towards the sunset (West) of all those who have their
dwelling in Europe)".
According to Greek mythology, (''Celtus'') was the son of Heracles and
(''Keltine''), the daughter of (''Bretannus''). Celtus became the eponymous ancestor
of Celts. In Latin ''Celta'' came in turn from Herodotus' word for the Gauls,
''Keltoi''. The Romans used ''Celtae'' to refer to continental Gauls, but
apparently not to Insular Celts. The latter were long divided linguistically
into Goidhels and Brythons, although other research provides a more complex
picture. Another complication is that in the case of the Romans, Gaul (Latin
Gallia) is a historical name used in the context of the Roman Empire in
references to the region of Western Europe approximating present day France and
Belgium, but also sometimes including the Po Valley, western Switzerland, and
the parts of the Netherlands and Germany on the west bank of the River Rhine.
In the third century B.C, Gauls immigrated from Thrace into the
highlands of central Anatolia (modern Turkey). These people, called Galatians,
later merged with the local population but retained many of their own
traditions. The Galatia became its ruling caste in the 3rd century B.C. It has
been called the "Gallia" of the East, Roman writers calling its
inhabitants Galli. St. Jerome states that as of the fourth century A.D. their
language was similar to that of the Treveri. This language is in fact German.
(The Romans called all people between the Pyrenees and the Rhine Gauls. The
word 'Gaul' didn't imply a specific language).
The German Celts were great warriors, respected by Greeks and
Romans. They hired themselves out as mercenary soldiers, sometimes fighting on
both sides in the great battles of the times. For years the chieftains and
their war bands ravaged the western half of Asia Minor, as allies of one or
other of the warring princes, without any serious check, until they sided with
the renegade Seleucid prince Antiochus Hierax, who reigned in Asia Minor.
Hierax tried to defeat king Attalus I of Pergamum (241–197 B.C.), but instead,
the hellenised cities united under his banner, and his armies inflicted several
severe defeats upon them, about 232 forcing them to settle permanently and to
confine themselves to the region to which they had already given their name.
The theme of the ''Dying Gaul'' (a famous statue displayed in Pergamon)
remained a favorite in Hellenistic art for a generation. Their right to the
district was formally recognized. The three Celtic tribes were settled where
they afterwards remained, the Tectosages round Ancyra, the Tolistobogii round
Pessinus, sacred to Cybele, and the Trocmi round Tavium.
Diodorus Siculus and Strabo both suggest that the Celtic heartland
was in southern France. The former says that the Gauls were to the north of the
Celts but that the Romans referred to both as Gauls. Before the discoveries at
Hallstatt and La Tene, it was generally considered that the Celtic heartland
was southern France, see Encyclopedia Britannica for 1813.
The Celts also expanded down the Danube river and its tributaries.
One of the most influential tribes, the Scordisci , had established their
capital at Singidunum in 3rd century BC, which is present-day Belgrade , Serbia
. The concentration of hill-forts and cemeteries shows a density of population
in the Tisza valley of modern-day Vojvodina , Serbia , Hungary and into Ukraine
. Expansion into Romania was however blocked by the Dacians .
Further south, Celts settled in Thrace ( Bulgaria ), which they
ruled for over a century, and Anatolia , where they settled as the Galatians
(see also: Gallic Invasion of Greece ) . Despite their geographical isolation
from the rest of the Celtic world, the Galatians maintained their Celtic
language for at least seven hundred years. St Jerome , who visited Ancyra
(modern-day Ankara ) in 373 AD, likened their language to that of the Treveri
of northern Gaul.
The Boii tribe gave their name to Bohemia , Bologna and possibly
Bavaria , and Celtic artefacts and cemeteries have been discovered further east
in what is now Poland and Slovakia . A celtic coin ( Biatec ) from Bratislava
's mint is displayed on today's Slovak 5 crown coin.
As there is no archaeological evidence for large scale invasions
in some of the other areas, one current school of thought holds that Celtic
language and culture spread to those areas by contact rather than invasion.
However, the Celtic invasions of Italy and the expedition in Greece and western
Anatolia , are well documented in Greek and Latin history. There are
records of Celtic mercenaries in Egypt serving the Ptolemies. Thousands were
employed in 283-246 B.C. and they were also in service around 186 BC. They
attempted to overthrow Ptolemy II. It had been known for long time that
there was an early Celtic (Lepontic, sometimes called Cisalpine Celtic)
presence in Northern Italy since inscriptions dated to the sixth century B.C.
have been found there.
The site of Golasecca, where the Ticino exits from Lake Maggiore,
was particularly suitable for long-distance exchanges, in which Golaseccans
acted as intermediaries between Etruscans and the Halstatt culture of Austria,
supported on the all-important trade in salt.
In 391 B.C. Celts "who had their homes beyond the Alps
streamed through the passes in great strength and seized the territory that lay
between the Appennine mountains and the Alps" according to Diodorus
Siculus. The Po Valley and the rest of northern Italy (known to the Romans as
Cisalpine Gaul) was inhabited by Celtic-speakers who founded cities such as
Milan. Later the Roman army was routed at the battle of Allia and Rome was
sacked in 390 B.C. by the Senones. At the battle of Telamon in 225 B.C. a
large Celtic army was trapped between two Roman forces and crushed.
The defeat of the combined Samnite, Celtic and Etruscan alliance
by the Romans in the Third Samnite War sounded the beginning of the end of the
Celtic domination in mainland Europe, but it was not until 192 B.C. that the
Roman armies conquered the last remaining independent Celtic kingdoms in
Italy. The Celts settled much further south of the Po River than many maps
show. Remnants in the town of Doccia, in the province of Emilia-Romagna,
showcase Celtic houses in very good condition dating from about the 4th century
B.C.
Rome would continue to grow, and in time it would come to absorb
the classical Greek civilization as well. As Rome extended its influence
and presence throughout the Mediterranean world, it encountered and absorbed
deities and religious practices of those it encountered. Attempts were made
periodically to suppress religions that seemed to threaten traditional morality
and unity; the Dionysian mysteries provoked unseemly exhibitions of enthusiasm
and wild behaviour, Christianity was superstition, or atheism, or both; and
druidism was thought to employ human sacrifice. Judaism was merely tolerated.
By late antiquity, numerous foreign cults had gained vast popularity in the
farthest reaches of the Empire, including the mystery cult of the syncretized
Egyptian goddess Isis, and deities of solar monism such as Mithras and Sol
Invictus, found as far north as Roman Britain.
Roman myth is complicated by the early influence of Greek religion
on the Italian peninsula during Rome's protohistory, and by the later
self-conscious imitation of Greek literary models by Roman authors, who
borrowed narratives of Greek deities reinterpreted as the counterparts of
Rome's own pantheon. Rome's early myths and legends also have a dynamic
relationship with Etruscan religion, less documented than that of the Greeks.
Some examples of
Egyptian-to-Greek-to-Roman Mythology
|
Egyptian
|
Greek
|
Roman
|
|
Amun
|
Zeus
|
Jupiter ("Zeus pater")
|
|
Hathor
|
Aphrodite
|
Venus
|
|
Khonsu
|
Heracles
|
Hercules
|
|
Isis
|
Demeter (Io)
|
Ceres
|
|
Osiris
|
Dionysus
|
Bacchus
|
|
Horus
|
Apollo
|
Apollo
|
According to Greek myth Heracles was a divine hero, the son
of Zeus and Alcmene, foster son of Amphitryon and great-grandson (and
half-brother) of Perseus. He was the greatest of the Greek heroes, a paragon of
masculinity, the ancestor of royal clans who claimed to be Heracleidae and a
champion of the Olympian order against chthonic monsters. In Rome and the
modern West, he is known as Hercules, with whom the later Roman Emperors, in
particular Commodus and Maximian, often identified themselves. The Romans
adopted the Greek version of his life and works essentially unchanged.
Alcmene was born to Electryon, king of Mycenae and a son of
Perseus. Her mother was either Anaxo, daughter of Alcaeus and Astydamia, or
Lysidice, daughter of Pelops and Hippodameia. Hesiod describes Alcmene as the
tallest, most beautiful woman with wisdom surpassed by no person born of mortal
parents. It is said that her face and dark eyes were as charming as
Aphrodite's, and that she honoured her husband like no woman before her. She
was the great-granddaughter of Zeus.
According to Roman myth, Rome was founded by Romulus and his twin
brother Remus, descendants of Aeneas, divinely fathered by Hercules on a virgin
princess or priestess of Vesta, who was exposed to die, but saved by a series
of miraculous interventions. They were eventually restored to their royal
birthright but decided to found a new city for themselves and their followers.
When they could not agree on its site, they used augury to seek the opinion of
the gods. Romulus was sent the most favourable signs, and established a city on
the Capitoline Hill, and created its sacred boundary; Remus insulted the new
city and was killed. Romulus named the new city "Rome" after himself,
appointed its first senate and organised its armies. Faced with a shortage of
marriageable young women, he invented a religious festival, the Consualia,
invited the neighbouring Sabines then kidnapped their daughters.
Each of Rome's legendary or semi-legendary kings was associated
with one or more of the religious institutions familiar to the later Republic.
Tullus Hostilius and Ancus Marcius devised the fetial priests and their rites.
The first "outsider" Etruscan king, Lucius Tarquinius Priscus founded
a Capitoline temple to Jupiter, Juno and Minerva which served as a later model
for the highest official cult throughout the Roman world. The benevolent,
divinely fathered Servius Tullius established the Latin League and built its
Aventine Temple to Diana, and instituted the Compitalia to mark his social
reforms. His arrogant successor (and murderer) Tarquinius "the Proud"
was expelled, and Rome became a Republic, run by annually appointed consuls.
Correction to the lies of the White Mans History
Contrary to the racist revisionism of modern Whites: Rome, like
Greece, was a multi-ethnic, multi-racial society. With many Black or mixed-race
kings, Black Popes, Black Commanders, soldiers, sailors, and of course
citizens. (Being mindful of the White mans propensity for manufacturing fake
artifacts to show Whites, there is no guarantee that the following Busts are
accurate). And of course, much of our current crop of Greek and Roman sculpture
are 18th - 19th century creations. We oftentimes compare Coins with Busts to
ascertain the truth. But unfortunately, Whites are also expert at creating
perfect fake coins, which look like ancient coins, so there is no guarantee
there either. The one saving grace, is that with Black kings, the fabricators
will sometimes leave a hint of Blackness in the image, rather than making it
appear pure White. Thus from that hint, we can extrapolate.
Trajan
Emperor Trajan (53–117 AD) was Roman Emperor from 98 A.D. until
his death. Officially declared by the senate as optimus princeps ("the
best ruler"), Trajan is remembered as a successful soldier-emperor who
presided over the greatest military expansion in Roman history, leading the
empire to attain its maximum territorial extent by the time of his death. He is
also known for his philanthropic rule, overseeing extensive public building
programs and implementing social welfare policies, which earned him his enduring
reputation as the second of the Five Good Emperors who presided over an era of
peace and prosperity in the Mediterranean world.
According to the Wiki article: "Plaster casts of the relief
were taken in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. After a century of acid
pollution, they are now more legible in some details than the original."
Implied in that statement, is that the first 1,800 years exposed
to the elements did little damage, it was the last 100 years where the
"Real" damage occurred. Therefore these plaster casts showing the
Romans as Albino people are accurate! Of course those casts are typical Albino
falsifications, the same as was done to almost every piece of historical
artifact that they got their hands on. And as usual, they use a stupid lie,
believable to only the most motivated fools, to cover it up.
Which Caracalla is the Fake???
From the full text of "The Scriptores historiae
augustae
(The Historia Augusta) with an English
translation".
VIII. Now when the
confusion in the state was at
its height, inasmuch as it was made known that there
were three several emperors, Septimius Severus,
Pescennius Niger, and Clodius Albinus, the priest
of the Delphic Apollo was asked which of them as
emperor would prove of most profit to the state,
whereupon, it is said, he gave voice to a Greek verse
as follows :
"Best
is the Dark One, the African good, but the
worst is the White One."
PESCENNIUS NIGER VIII. 2 IX.
And in this response it was
clearly understood that
Niger was meant by the Dark One, Severus by the
African, and Albinus by the White One. Thereupon
the curiosity of the questioners was aroused, and they
asked who would really win the empire. To this
the priest replied with further verses somewhat as
follows :
"Both of the Black and
the White shall the life-blood be shed all untimely;
Empire over the world shall be held by the native of Carthage."
And then when the priest
was asked who should suc-
ceed this man, he gave answer, it is said, with another
Greek verse :
"He whom the dwellers
above have called by the
surname of Pius."
But this was altogether
unintelligible until Bassianus
took the name Antoninus, 1 which was Pius' true
surname. And when finally they asked how long he
should rule, the priest is said to have replied in
Greek as follows :
"Surely with twice ten
ships he will cleave the Italian waters,
Only let one of his barques
bound o'er the plain of the sea."
From this they perceived
that Severus would round out twenty years.
417
FAKE BRONZES
The Albino people of today, who are invaders from Central Asia in
the modern era: Germanics, Slavs, and Turks; are degenerate fakers of history,
so as to make it appear that they participated in the making of Western
History. To this end they not only lie and make up false history, they also
create fake artifacts of every kind. Here are some things to look out for with
the Bronzes.
A
perfect example of the difference between the White Mans History: and
"Real" factual History!
|
The
legend of Saint Maurice and the Theban legion (circa 250 A.D.)
St. Maurice was an Egyptian from Thebes in Upper Egypt, and
General (primicerius) of the Theban Legion. The Theban legend relates that
the legion, composed entirely of Christians, had been called from Thebes in
southern Egypt, to suppress a revolt of the Bagandae (also Christians) in
Gaul (now Saint-Maurice Switzerland). After victory, the soldiers were
ordered to sacrifice (Bagandae prisoners?) to the gods in thanksgiving by
Roman Emperor Maximian Herculius. But at Maurice’s urging, they refused.
Every tenth soldier was then killed (decimation). Another order to sacrifice
and another refusal caused a second decimation, and then a general massacre
of the Legion. (A Roman legion was typically composed of perhaps 6,000
soldiers, divided into "cohorts" and further divided into
"centuries").
So reads the earliest account of their martyrdom, contained in
the public letter of Eucherius, bishop of Lyon (434–450), addressed to his
fellow bishop Salvius. Alternate versions have the legion refusing Maximian's
orders only after discovering a town they had just destroyed had been
inhabited by innocent Christians. And some have Maurice as a captain of the
legion.
This legend and its historical implications are a wonderful
example of the pathetic racism and outrageous stupidity; of the nonsense
Whites try to pass of as history. Lets deconstruct this nonsense for
examination.
First, Maurice is not an Egyptian name.
Now lets look at the logistics of this: If Emperor Maximian was in Rome at
the time he sent for Maurice, it would have taken a minimum of 32 days for
the message to reach Maurice. It would have taken Maurice 15-30 days to
gather up his 6,000 men and supplies for the journey. On his 80 day (armies
travel slow) 2,000 mile journey to Switzerland he would have PASSED Rome. All
told, 4-5 months have passed: the Bagandae couldn’t have been much of a
threat, and Emperor Maximian must have been very weak militarily. So then,
exactly who were the Roman troops with the strength to impose a decimation,
and then a massacre, on Maurice’s 6,000 strong Army? Pure nonsense!
Maurice is said to have the title of "Primicerius".
But in the military, the use of the term was restricted to units associated
with the imperial court, chiefly imperial guards. WHAT WOULD THE IMPERIAL
GUARD BE DOING IN EGYPT? Worst yet logically - PERMANENTLY STATIONED THERE?
Pure nonsense!
Maurice died 287 A.D. Eucherius, Bishop of Lyon, discovered his
story, and wrote about him in about 450 A.D. THEN about ONE THOUSAND years
LATER: Whites SUDDENLY started making Statues and Paintings of Maurice in
MEDIEVAL UNIFORM, not ROMAN UNIFORM! Pure nonsense!
Why would Whites need to come up with such a ridicules story?
Simple: they needed an explanation for the presence of a prominent Black man
in Europe. There are just too many statues and paintings of him to hide or
destroy, and replace with White depictions of him – as they usually do. So
that ridiculous story was the only way to explain his presence in Europe.
Take note that they were careful to place his origin in Africa. Because as we
all know, that is the only place Blacks were found in those days – according
to the nonsense of Whites.
So who was Maurice? Owing to the fact that he became the Patron
saint of the Germany based, Holy Roman Empire: He was probably a Celt from
what is now Germany.
But to be clear - the images of Black knights commonly called
Saint Maurice by Albino historians WERE REAL BLACK KNIGHTS of the medieval
period! Research has revealed that the one above was Ulrich von Hutten (1488
– 1523) who was a German scholar, poet and reformer. He was an outspoken
critic of the Roman Catholic Church and a bridge between the humanists and
the Lutheran Reformation. He was a leader of the Imperial Knights of the Holy
Roman Empire.
Btw - It appears that in the medieval, ALL knights were Black,
as there are few authentic images of Albino knights.
|
Roman
Citizens
The next wave of Whites/Albinos from Central Asia
At the turn of the
"modern Era" (year "0" A.D.) The Mongol Huns chased the
Dravidian Albino Germanic's and Slav's out of Asia.
We have no good single
source to explain the expulsion of the Albino Germanic's and Slav's from
Central Asia.
Consequently several
sources must be referenced:
See: The Roman historian
Jordanes, his book on the history of the Goths, called "Getica"
(circa 551 A.D.)
See: The Byzantine
historian Zosimus (491-518), his book "Historia Nova"
See: The historian
Priscus (circa 450 A.D.)
See: Ammianus Marcellinus
(325–391) a fourth-century Roman historian.
Note: excerpts from those
sources are in the "Eastern Europe" page (Main menu).
Six hundred years later,
another group of Mongols chased the last of the Dravidian Albinos out of Asia -
The Turks.
We do not have a good
single source for the expulsion of the Germanic's and Slav's, but the following
is a good, not overly complicated, source for the Turks.
The Turks
|
The End
of Europe's Middle Ages
Origins
of the Ottoman Empire
Pressured out of their homes in the Asian steppes by the
Mongols, the Turkish tribes converted to Islam during the eighth and ninth
centuries. By the tenth century, one of the Turkish tribes, the seljuk , had
become a significant power in the Islamic world and had adopted a settled
life that included Islamic orthodoxy, a central administration, and taxation.
However, many other Turkish groups remained nomadic and, pursuing the gazi
tradition, sought to conquer land for Islam and to acquire war booty for themselves.
This led them into conflict with the Seljuk Turks, and to pacify the nomadic
tribes, the Seljuks directed them to the eastern domain of the Byzantine
Empire, Anatolia. The tribe known as the Ottomans arose from one of the
smaller emirates established in northwestern Anatolia after 1071. The dynasty
was named for Osman (1259-1326), who began to expand his kingdom into the
Byzantine Empire in Asia Minor, moving his capital to Bursa in 1326.
The above passage is from the University of Calgary's tutorial
"The End of Europe's Middle Ages" which is designed to assist those
students engaged in Renaissance, Reformation and Early Modern studies who
lack a background in medieval European history. Intended to provide a brief
overview of the conditions at the end of Europe's Middle Ages, the tutorial
is presented in a series of chapters that summarize the economic, political,
religious and intellectual environment of the fourteenth and fifteenth
centuries. The main objective of the tutorial is to furnish a baseline
against which the vast changes of the following centuries may be measured. In
the main, the tutorial is rudimentary, but the part on the Turks is quite
good, that is why it is listed here.
|
The Germanic's and Slav's
The point has been made in these pages, many times, that modern
Whites are derived from Central Asian Albinos, who invaded Europe in the early
modern era. And that modern Whites have little relationship to Ancient
Europeans, Greeks or Romans. To make this point, we quote "Cornelius
Tacitus" (who was likely a Celt, 56 - 117 A.D.) He was a senator,
and a historian of the Roman Empire: We quote from his book, The Germania
(Latin: De Origine et situ Germanorum, literally Concerning the Origin and
Situation of the Germanics).
|
Cornelius Tacitus, Germany and its Tribes
The Germans themselves I should regard as aboriginal, and not
mixed at all with other races through immigration or intercourse. For, in
former times, it was not by land but on shipboard that those who sought to
emigrate would arrive; and the boundless and, so to speak, hostile ocean
beyond us (the north Sea), is seldom entered by a sail from our world. And,
beside the perils of rough and unknown seas, who would leave Asia, or Africa,
or Italy for Germany, with its wild country, its inclement skies, its sullen
manners and aspect, unless indeed it were his home? In their ancient songs,
their only way of remembering or recording the past, they celebrate an
earth-born god, Tuisco, and his son Mannus, as the origin of their race, as
their founders.
The name Germany, on the other hand, they say, is modern and
newly introduced, from the fact that the tribes which first crossed the Rhine
and drove out the Gauls, and are now called Tungrians, were then called
Germans. Thus what was the name of a tribe, and not of a race, gradually
prevailed, till all called themselves by this self-invented name of Germans,
which the conquerors had first employed to inspire terror.
For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of
Germany are free from all taint of inter-marriages with foreign nations, and
that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves.
Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population.
All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, (classic Albinism), huge frames, fit
only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat
and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate
and their soil inure them.
|
Decline of the Roman Empire
When Constantine became the sole Roman Emperor in 324,
Christianity became the leading religion of the empire. After the death of
Constantine in 337, two of his sons, Constantius II and Constans took over the
leadership of the empire. Constans, ruler of the western provinces, was like
his father, a Christian. In 341, he decreed that all pre-Christian Graeco Roman
worship and sacrifice should cease; warning those who still persisted in
practising ancient Graeco-Roman polytheism with the threat of the death penalty.
Lay Christians took advantage of new anti-Graeco-Roman polytheism
laws by destroying and plundering the temples. Temples that survived were
converted into Christian churches: the Pantheon is the most notable example,
having once been a temple to all the gods and later, removing the statues of
the so-called 'pagan' gods and replacing them with Christian saints, becoming a
church in honor of their own one god. Many of the buildings in the Roman Forum
were similarly converted, preserving the structures if not their original
intent.
Later on, the emperor Julian the Apostate attempted to reverse the
process of Christianization and bring back the native forms of polytheism, but
his death in Persia caused the empire to once again fall under the power of Christian
control, this time permanently.
The decline of the Roman Empire was a slow process, which occurred
over a period of over 350 years. Beginning at about 100 A.D. and culminating on
September 4, 476, when Romulus Augustus, the last Emperor of the Western Roman
Empire, was deposed by Odoacer, a Germanic chieftain.
Though by appearance, Odoacer was probably a Celt/Gaul: they being
the original people of Germany. With the actual true (White) Germaic's
following. Note that Odoacers hair stands straight up, White peoples hair
cannot do that naturally. (Laugh at the example if you will, but the point
still holds true, also note Vercingetorix's hair).
Today's descendants of the Germanic, Slav, and Turk Albinos from
Central Asia, have so confused and obfuscated history with their false accounts
and fake artifacts, that it is impossible at this time, to say definitively
what the hierarchy of ancient western Rome was like, (from artifacts, we know
that the Eastern Empire was ruled by Blacks). What little that we do have of
artifactual evidence, suggests that like the Eastern Empire, the Western Empire
was also ruled by Blacks. This painting of unknown provenance and period, may
well be fanciful, but we feel that it accurately depicts the hierarchy of the
Western Roman Empire.
Charlemagne
Rome's replacement
"The Holy Roman Empire" was a realm that existed for about a
millennium in West and Central Europe: ruled by a Holy Roman Emperor.
Charlemagne (meaning Charles the Great; possibly 742 – 28 January 814 - King of
the Franks). He expanded the Frankish kingdom (France) into an empire that
incorporated much of Western and Central Europe. During his reign, he conquered
Italy and was crowned Imperator Augustus by Pope Leo III on 25 December 800
A.D. This temporarily made him a rival of the Byzantine Emperor in
Constantinople. His rule is also associated with the Carolingian Renaissance, a
revival of art, religion, and culture through the medium of the Catholic
Church. Through his foreign conquests and internal reforms, Charlemagne helped
define both Western Europe and the Middle Ages.
He is numbered as Charles I in the regnal lists of Germany (where
he is known as Karl der GroĂźe), the Holy Roman Empire, and France. He was
crowned Emperor of the Romans in 800 A.D. and was then the forerunner of the
Holy Roman Emperors, largely because he had inaugurated the tradition of
imperial coronation by the Pope of the Catholic Church. This continued as a
significant institution in the Holy Roman Empire until the 16th century. In a
decree following the 1512 Diet of Cologne, the name was officially changed to
Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. Charlemagne's policy of "renovatio
Romanorum imperii" (reviving the Roman Empire) remained at least in
theory, as the official position of the Empire until its end in 1806.
Was Charlemagne a Black man? At this point there is no way to know
- and that information is not likely to be forthcoming. But it appears that
contrary to what Whites say, the Franks were probably a "Native" NOT
Germanic people. As such, Charlemagne would have indeed, probably been a Black
man. But because Whites have so interwoven European history with lies, there
are really no safe assumptions, and no safe place to start.
As to the false Coin: In 1861, Charlemagne's tomb was opened by
scientists who reconstructed his skeleton and estimated it to be measured 74.9
inches (190 centimeters). A modern study based on the dimensions of his tibia
estimate his height as 1.84 m. This puts him in the 99th percentile of tall
people of his period given that average male height of his time was 1.69 m. The
width of the bone suggest he was gracile not robust in body build. So at least
one thing we know for sure: that COIN image is NOT of Charlemagne. But what's
new, Whites routinely use fake artifacts to bolster their lies. Charlemagne was
actively and personally involved in wars into distant lands throughout his 46
year reign - Fat guys don't get around like that! So whoever decided to falsely
use that coin, didn't even know the history of the man.
But there is no ambiguity about Charlemagne's successor as Holy
Roman Emperor: Otto I, he was most certainly a Black man!
Holy Roman Emperor: Otto I
Note: Otto I is the Black
Freising King on the "Coat of Arms" of the current Pope: Pope
Benedict XVI, who is of German extraction.
Otto I, the Great (23
November 912 in Wallhausen – 7 May 973 in Memleben), son of Henry I the Fowler
and Matilda of Ringelheim, was Duke of Saxony, King of Germany, King of Italy,
and "the first of the Germans to be called the emperor of Italy"
according to Arnulf of Milan. While Charlemagne had been crowned emperor in
800, his empire had been divided amongst his grandsons, and following the assassination
of Berengar of Friuli in 924, the imperial title had lain vacant for nearly
forty years. Otto succeeded his father as king of the Saxons in 936, on
February 2, 962, Otto was crowned Emperor of what would later become the Holy
Roman Empire.
Edith of England (910 – 26 January 946), also spelt Eadgyth or
Ædgyth, was the daughter of Edward the Elder, King of England and Ælfflæd. Her
paternal grandparents were Alfred the Great, King of Wessex, and his wife
Ealhswith. (The obvious corollary is that Edith came from a long line of Black
British royalty).
Click Here for more on Black British Royalty: Click
>>>
|
In order to seal an alliance between two Saxon kingdoms, her
half-brother, King Athelstan of England, sent two of his sisters to Germany,
instructing the Duke of Saxony (later Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor) to choose
whichever one pleased him best. Otto chose Edith and married her in 929. The
remaining sister Algiva or Adiva was married to a "king near the Jupiter
mountains" (the Alps). The precise identity of this sister is debated. She
may have been Eadgifu of England, who married King Charles III of France, or
another sister otherwise unknown to history.
As queen, Eadgyth undertook the usual state duties of a Queen:
when she turns up in the records it is generally in connection with gifts to
the state's favoured monasteries or memorials to female holy women and saints.
In this respect she seems to have been more diligent than her now widowed and
subsequently sainted mother-in-law Queen Matilda whose own charitable
activities only achieve a single recorded mention from the period of Eadgyth's
time as queen. There was probably rivalry between the Benedictine Monastery of
St Maurice founded at Magdeburg by Otto and Eadgyth in 937, a year after coming
to the throne and Matilda's foundation at Quedlinburg Abbey, intended by her as
a memorial to her husband, the late King Henry I. Like her brother, Athelstan,
Edith was devoted to the cult of Saint Oswald and was instrumental in
introducing this cult into Germany after her marriage to the emperor. Her
lasting influence may have caused certain monasteries and churches in Saxony to
be dedicated to this saint.
Eadgyth died at a relatively young age. Her tomb is located
in the Cathedral of Magdeburg, Germany. A lead coffin inside a stone
sarcophagus with her name on it was found and opened in 2008 by archaeologists
during work on the building. An inscription recorded that it was the body of
Eadgyth, reburied in 1510. It was examined in 2009, then brought to Bristol,
England, for tests in 2010. Professor Mark Horton of Bristol University said
that "this may prove to be the oldest complete remains of an English royal."
Edith and Otto's children were: 1. Liutgarde, married Conrad the
Red, 2. Liudolf, Duke of Swabia (930-September 6 957)
Click Here for medieval
Christian frescos from northern Greece: Click >>>
|
Click Here for
histories and images of some of the first Christians: Click >>>
|
 From the words of
Cornelius Tacitus, and others: Herodotus, Xenophanes, it is clear that the
ancient Romans and Greeks did NOT look like the White, Blue-eyed, Red haired
Germaic's. And of course from modern studies, we know that aside from being
Germaic, the modern populations also have significant Turk admixture. But
just WHO were these White Germanic invaders?
Major Germanic Peoples:
English, Norwegians, Danes/Denmark, Franks/France, Goths/Spain, Saxons,
Finni, Flemish, Icelanders, Frisians, Gall, Batavians, Calucones, Dutch,
Helisii, Ingvaeones (North Sea Germans), Irminones (Elbe Germans), Istvaeones
(Rhine-Weser Germans), Jutes, Juthungi, Lombards or Langobardes, Ostrogoths,
Teutons, Vagoth, Vandals, Vangiones, Vargiones, Varini, Varisci, Vinoviloth, Viruni,
Visburgi, Visigoths, Vispi.
(Pretty much all of
Modern Europe, isn't it).
|
The European Dark Ages
The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to the perceived
period of both cultural and economic deterioration as well as disruption that
took place in Western Europe following the decline of the Roman Empire: the
phrase was first recorded in 1602. Originally, the term characterized the bulk
of the Middle Ages as a period of intellectual darkness between the
extinguishing of the light of Rome, and the Renaissance or rebirth from the
14th century onwards.
The concept of a Dark Age originated with the Italian scholar
Petrarch (Francesco Petrarca) in the 1330s, and was originally intended as a
sweeping criticism of the character of Late Latin literature. Petrarch regarded
the post-Roman centuries as "dark" compared to the light of classical
antiquity. Later historians expanded the term to refer to the transitional
period between Roman times and the High Middle Ages, including not only the
lack of Latin literature, but also a lack of contemporary written history,
general demographic decline, limited building activity and material cultural
achievements in general. Popular culture has further expanded on the term as a
vehicle to depict the Middle Ages as a time of backwardness, extending its
pejorative use and expanding its scope.
The Problem!
Just as the Hellenes and Romans were an illiterate nomadic people,
when they first entered Black Europe over a thousand years earlier. And just as
they struggled to learn the ways and technologies of civilization, so it was
also for the Germanic's. And just as before, there was a "Dark Ages"
of regression, while they learned the ways of civilization.
But unlike the Hellenes, the Germanic's did NOT attribute their
inheritance of civilization to the rightful benefactor (albeit an unwilling
benefactor), the Black ancients. They perhaps ignorantly, perhaps racistly,
attributed it to the Classical Greeks. Though somewhat eclipsed by technology
today, the sense of a legacy was strongly felt by post-Renaissance European
elite, who saw themselves as the spiritual heirs of Greece. As late as 1939
Will Durant could write "excepting machinery, there is hardly anything
secular in our culture that does not come from Greece," and conversely
"there is nothing in Greek civilization that doesn't illuminate our
own".
Had it remained just a sense of debt to the ancient Greeks, the
world would have been a much better place today. But it did not, the Germanic's
not having any history of their own, decided to make one up, with the Hellenes
and Romans as the base. They decided that they were the descendants of the
Hellenes and Romans, but since they were White skinned, Blue-eyed, Blond
haired, and the Hellenes and Romans were not. They decided to create statues
and other artifacts depicting Hellenes and Romans as such.
Then, perhaps as a "Snowballing" effect, they decided
that ALL ancient civilizations must be White like them also: soon White
Egyptian artifacts began to appear (exclusive of the legitimate Greek and Roman
period type). Then ancient Europeans, Mesopotamian's, Hebrews, and Persians
became White. Then with their success in wars of expansion and colonization,
they decided that because they were so great, then everyone previous of any
consequence must also have been White - and the requisite artifacts thus
appeared. (All this from a people who just a few hundred years earlier,
couldn't figure out why it was a bad idea to shit in the same places that you
took your drinking water from).
Under the heading "Better late than Never" mainstream
White media, in the form of "The Guardian" known until 1959 as The
Manchester Guardian (founded 1821), a British national daily newspaper: for
reasons unknown, has decided to acknowledge the obvious: Greece and Rome were
NOT Albino societies or cultures, and decided to do a newsstory on it, Thursday
11 July 2013.
The
headline: Ancient Greece, the Middle East and an ancient cultural internet
The
ancient Greek world is being recast from an isolated entity to one of many
hybrid cultures in Africa and in the East
(Note: The pictures
associated with the newsstory are often incorrect).
The Turks
The next, and final wave of White Asians, the Turks, continued
their migrations into Europe, North Africa, and Western Asia, well into the
modern era. And just like the previous Whites, they were bent on conquest. And
just like the Germanic's, having no history, they decided to create a place in
history for themselves. Thus they became the descendants of the Berbers,
Egyptians, Mesopotamian's, Persians, Phoenicians, and Arabs - and oh yes, the
Hebrews, vis-Ă -vis the Khazar Turks.
Interestingly though, Turks in Turkey proper, are taught something
quite different. In the Turkish Nations creation myth (a modern country with a
creation myth?). From tomes: a large or scholarly book, produced by the
Ministry of Education in 1932; Turks are taught that at the dawn of history,
their ancestors, led by a mythical gray she-wolf, started migrating outwards
from the heart of Central Asia. As the numbers of their people swelled and
droughts dried the traditional grazing lands on the steppe, some of them, they
are told, even crossed the Bering Strait into the Americas. Presumably becoming
the American Indians. In his later years, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (the founder of
the modern Turkey nation), himself adopted a creed known as the "Sun
Theory", which depicts the Turks as the mother race of all mankind, and
proposed that all human languages are descendants of one proto-Turkic primal
language. (Note: though the theory may sound outlandish, there is
justification, and anecdotal evidence, for believing that at least the "North
American Indian" was a Turk mulatto).
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, taught that the Turks discovered the
America's fifty years before Christopher Columbus. The proof of this assertion,
he told journalist, was that the Turks and Caicos Islands in the Caribbean, had
obviously been named by Turks, especially since their capital was called Grand
Turk. (The islands are in fact named after a fez-shaped cactus).
Under the heading "This is Backwards": Just as Albino
media seems reconciled to the fact that the truth of Greece and Rome will get
out. They seem determined to continue to pass-off the Turks and Turk mulattoes,
of North Africa, Arabia, Middle-East, and West Asia, as original people: rather
than the recent invaders that they are. Obviously this serves to continue the
myth that the original people of those areas were other than Black Africans.
But unfortunately for those purveyors of falsehood, many 19th century writers
had already acknowledged, and wrote about the Turk conquest and rule over parts
of Europe, Arabia, the Middle East, North Africa, etc. Needless to say, the
primary subject matter of these books is of no interest to us, and may in fact
be contrary to our position.
Prince Michael's Kingdom: A Review of the Epochs of Creation, and
of the Bible History by Charles R. Harvey (1880) Link
to book
The Christian Observer [Afterw.] the Christian Observer and
Advocate by Anonymous Author (1867) Link
to Book
A chronological, geographical and historical view of the ancient
and modern world, from the earliest period to 1850 (1851) Link
to Book
The Christian guardian - and Church of England magazine
(1833) Link
to Book
The Worlds Greatest Painter:
Michelangelo di Lodovico
Buonarroti Simoni - 6 March 1475 – 18 February 1564.
Michelangelo left no documented self-portrait. The often fanciful
portraits, said to have been done by his contemporary artists, are of course
not accurate, or done by his contemporaries, except the Ghisi engraving. His
contemporaries would have known exactly what he looked like, and there would
not have been such variation in his appearance as depicted in the various
portraits that now exist ( Whites do lie about these things). The description
by the 16th century painter and art historian Giorgio Vasari is all there is.
It seems that in reality, Michelangelo wasn't exactly a refined man, according
to Vasari, "he wore stockings of dogskin constantly for months together,
so that when he took them off the skin of the leg often came away with
them."
The only known self-portrait of the artist, is scratched into the
margin of one of Michelangelo's poems. It is said that the image is a sort of
caricature of the artist, done during the years he was painting the frescoes of
the Sistine Chapel in Rome. The drawing is described as showing him with
cartoon-like features including huge eyes and hair standing straight up on
ends." Interestingly, no photograph of the drawing seems to exist.
Regardless, the anecdotal
information like Ghisi's engraving, clearly indicates that Michelangelo was a
Black man. And it is the Black man Michelangelo who shows us what a
"Slave" really looked like in past times. Not surprisingly, it is
completely opposite to what the Albino people say.
|
Wiki: The Dying Slave
is a sculpture by the Italian Renaissance artist Michelangelo. Created
between 1513 and 1515, it was to serve with another figure, the Rebellious
Slave, at the tomb of Pope Julius II. It is a marble figure 2.15 metres (7'
4") in height, and is held at the Louvre, Paris.
|
A painter must paint that which the customer demands. But the
problem of reconciling the incongruities of the scene above - Black Parents,
White Children - seems to be reflected in the faces of Jacob and Michelangelo.
|
Who are these modern White (Albino) Europeans?
Through means and methods that we can still only guess at, these least of all
humans, both numerically and otherwise, had managed to gain control over much
of the world. Though that control is now waning, many, especially the
uneducated, are still dependent on them to tell us exactly who they are. But
even this simple task is complicated by the fact that these people once
claimed to be native to Europe, and today, the uneducated still do. Therefore
their researchers and educators tend to lie and double-talk as relates to the
origins of the European Albinos.
The Germanics:
This is particularly true of the Germanics: The basic ethnic stock in the
composition of the modern peoples of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland,
Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Northern Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium,
Luxembourg, North and central France, Lowland Scotland, and England. When we
go to the Encyclopedia to look-up Germanics, we are greeted with pure
nonsense as to their origins. But when we use a lateral approach, such as looking
up their former tormentors, the Huns, then we see more truthful entries.
Encyclopedia:
The Huns
The Huns occupied North China from the 3rd century until 581. Having swept
across Asia, they invaded the lower Volga valley (Russia - see map)
c.372 and advanced westward, pushing the Germanic Ostrogoths and Visigoths
before them and thus precipitating the great waves of migrations
(into Europe) that destroyed the Roman Empire and changed the face of Europe.
Bibliography
See T. Hodgkin, Italy and Her Invaders, Vol. I (rev. ed. 1892, repr. 1967);
W. M. McGovern, Early Empires of Central Asia (1939); E. A. Thompson, A
History of Attila and the Huns (1948); F. Teggart, China and Rome (1969,
repr. 1983); J. D. Maenchen-Helfen, The World of the Huns (1973).
The Slavs
The Slavs are the largest ethnic and linguistic group of peoples in Europe
belonging to the Indo-European linguistic family. It is estimated that the
Slavs number over 300 million in the world. They are usually classified in
three main divisions. The West Slavs include the Poles, the Czechs, the
Slovaks, and the Wends (also known as Lusatians) and other small groups in
East Germany. The South Slavs include the Serbs, the Croats, the Slovenes,
the Macedonians, the Montenegrins, the Bosniaks, and the Bulgars. The East
Slavs, the largest group, include the Great Russians, Ukrainians, and
Belorussians (or White Russians).
Origins
Ethnically the Slavs possess little unity, for they have mixed for centuries
with other peoples, including Turko-Tatars, Finnic peoples, Germans, Mongols,
Greeks, and Illyrian tribes. The Bulgarians are not of Slavic origin. The
obscure beginnings of the Slavs have given rise to several theories, all of
which include as a possible place of origin the area of the Polesie
marshes in Galicia (region spanning southeastern Poland and western Ukraine
). The ancestors of the Slavs were Neolithic tribes who occupied
this territory a few centuries before the Christian era. (The Albinos will
not venture into their origins before this time, as that would surely lead to
Central Asia and Albinohood).
Bibliography
See K. Jazdzewski, Atlas to the Prehistory of the Slavs (tr., 2 vol.,
1948—49); J. S. Roucek, ed., Slavonic Encyclopaedia (4 vol., 1949, repr.
1969); F. Dvornik, The Slavs (1956) and The Slavs in European History and
Civilization (1962, repr. 1986); S. H. Cross, Slavic Civilization through the
Ages (1963); A. P. Vlasto, The Entry of the Slav
s into Christendom (1970); M. A. Gimbutas, The Slavs (1971).
Turks
Because the Turks are now a predominately Mulatto people, no efforts are made
to hide their origins. Therefore all Albino sources will freely admit that
Turks were an Asian People.
Greeks and Romans
Greeks and Romans were a Black and Mulatto people comprised of the Original
Black Europeans and the first Central Asian Albinos to reach Europe, circa
1200 B.C. Modern Albinos have nothing to do with these people, as they were
the victims of the marauding Albinos from Central Asia. But modern Albinos do
falsely claim that the Hellenes of Greece were Albinos. The Greek historian
Herodotus clearly explains the Hellenes were only "partly Albino"
thusly:.
Herodotus (circa 440
B.C.)
Book 1 – CLIO
[1.58] The Hellenic race has never, since its first origin,
changed its speech. This at least seems evident to me. It was a branch of the
Pelasgic, which separated from the main body, and at first was scanty in
numbers and of little power; but it gradually spread and increased to a
multitude of nations, chiefly by the voluntary entrance into its
ranks of numerous tribes of barbarians.
|
Writing Blacks out-of-History
One of the great successes's of the Albino people, has been their
success in writing Blacks out-of-History. As can clearly be seen from the
preceding artifacts, not only are Blacks the original settlers of Europe, but
all throughout history, at every step, they have been the preeminent people.
Example: Greeks in the person of Alexander, took Egypt from the Persians who
had conquered it, and ruled Egypt from 332 to 30 B.C. The Romans took it from
them, and ruled from 30 B.C. to 640 A.D. at which point the Arabs took it from
them. In Egypt, the Europeans buried their dead in Egyptian style, but in
cemeteries exclusively for them. Typical of these European cemeteries are those
at the Fayum/Faiyum Oasis, 62 miles southwest of Cairo. The Mummy Portraits at
Fayum demonstrate that Greeks and Romans were Blacks and Whites, but in the
main "Mulattoes".
|
As we can see from this portrait, almost a century after
Benjamin Franklin's 1751 essay titled "America as a Land of
Opportunity" (where he declared that all of Europe's people were of a
"swarthy complexion") except the English and the Saxons: Europe was
still full of "swarthy Complexion people" (Mulattoes).
But the constant killings and expulsions of European Blacks as
a result of the English Civil War (1642), and the Thirty years Wars
(1618–1648) in continental Europe: (which were really "Race" wars),
left few Blacks in Europe for this type of person to mate with. The result
has been an inexorable Whiting of Europe's population through inbreeding: and
the associated shrinking of the European gene pool. Today, Europeans have the
smallest genetic diversity of all, and the greatest risk of inherited
disease.
|
Closing thoughts:
Let us end with a rather
sad observation: As we have seen, the Albino peoples history is a totally
made-up contrivance, devoid of much truth at all. Likewise is their definition
of themselves: they steadfastly refuse to believe/acknowledge that they are Albinos,
yet every honest study that they have ever done for themselves, clearly shows
that they are indeed either Albinos, or the much more numerous and darker ones,
those who are "derived" from Albinos, (through admixture with Black
Europeans).
By way of example, let us
look at a 1997 study done by Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, who is an Italian
population geneticist born in Genoa, who has been a professor at Stanford
University since 1970 (now emeritus).
Comments
Post a Comment